South Korea vs Rwanda: Chief executive of the government is elected
South Korea
1
in 2025
Rwanda
1
in 2025
South Korea rank
1st
Rwanda rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- South Korea
- Rwanda
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 1 against 1 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 78 shared years of data; in 1948 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | South Korea |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | South Korea |
| 1960s | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | South Korea |
| 1980s | 0.9 | 1 | 0.1 | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | South Korea |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, South Korea or Rwanda?
- South Korea, at 1 against 1 in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between South Korea and Rwanda?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Rwanda?
- 78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
- How do South Korea and Rwanda rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- South Korea ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.