Kiribati vs South Korea: Chief executive of the government is elected
Kiribati
1
in 2025
South Korea
1
in 2025
Kiribati rank
1st
South Korea rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Kiribati
- South Korea
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 1 against 1 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 78 shared years of data; in 1948 it was South Korea ahead.
Kiribati ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | South Korea |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | South Korea |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | South Korea |
| 1970s | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.7 | South Korea |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Kiribati or South Korea?
- Kiribati, at 1 against 1 in South Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Kiribati and South Korea?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and South Korea?
- 78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and South Korea rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Kiribati ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.