Jordan vs Liechtenstein: Chief executive of the government is elected

Jordan
0
in 2025
Liechtenstein
0
in 2025
Jordan rank
165th
Liechtenstein rank
165th

Chief executive of the government is elected over time

  • Jordan
  • Liechtenstein
00.20.40.60.81181419192025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0 against 0 in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.

Across all 104 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 165th and Liechtenstein ranks 165th of 197 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0 0 0 β€”
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Jordan or Liechtenstein?
Jordan, at 0 against 0 in Liechtenstein as of 2025.
What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Jordan and Liechtenstein?
0, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Liechtenstein?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Jordan and Liechtenstein rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
Jordan ranks 165th and Liechtenstein ranks 165th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Chief executive of the government is elected
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves β€” such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization β€” as not holding executive elections.