Israel vs Rwanda: Chief executive of the government is elected

Israel
1
in 2025
Rwanda
1
in 2025
Israel rank
1st
Rwanda rank
1st

Chief executive of the government is elected over time

  • Israel
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.60.81191619702025

How they compare

Israel currently reports 1 against 1 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 78 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Rwanda ahead.

Israel ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Rwanda Difference Ahead
1940s 0.5 0 0.5 Israel
1950s 1 0 1 Israel
1960s 1 0.8 0.2 Israel
1970s 1 0.5 0.5 Israel
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 0.4 0.6 Israel
2000s 1 0.7 0.3 Israel
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Israel or Rwanda?
Israel, at 1 against 1 in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Israel and Rwanda?
0, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Rwanda?
78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
How do Israel and Rwanda rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
Israel ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Chief executive of the government is elected
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves β€” such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization β€” as not holding executive elections.