Guatemala vs Ukraine: Chief executive of the government is elected
Guatemala
1
in 2025
Ukraine
1
in 2025
Guatemala rank
1st
Ukraine rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Guatemala
- Ukraine
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 1 against 1 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 1st and Ukraine ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Guatemala |
| 1930s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Guatemala |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Ukraine |
| 1960s | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | Ukraine |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | Ukraine |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Guatemala or Ukraine?
- Guatemala, at 1 against 1 in Ukraine as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Guatemala and Ukraine?
- 0, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Ukraine?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Guatemala and Ukraine rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Guatemala ranks 1st and Ukraine ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.