Grenada vs Kazakhstan: Chief executive of the government is elected

Grenada
1
in 2025
Kazakhstan
1
in 2025
Grenada rank
1st
Kazakhstan rank
1st

Chief executive of the government is elected over time

  • Grenada
  • Kazakhstan
00.20.40.60.81180019122025

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Grenada ranks 1st and Kazakhstan ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1950s 0 1 1 Kazakhstan
1960s 0.3 1 0.7 Kazakhstan
1970s 0.9 1 0.1 Kazakhstan
1980s 0.6 1 0.4 Kazakhstan
1990s 1 0.9 0.1 Grenada
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Grenada or Kazakhstan?
Grenada, at 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Grenada and Kazakhstan?
0, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Kazakhstan?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Grenada and Kazakhstan rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
Grenada ranks 1st and Kazakhstan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Chief executive of the government is elected
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves β€” such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization β€” as not holding executive elections.