Ecuador vs Latvia: Chief executive of the government is elected
Ecuador
1
in 2025
Latvia
1
in 2025
Ecuador rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Ecuador
- Latvia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1 against 1 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Ecuador |
| 1920s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Latvia |
| 1930s | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | Ecuador |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | Latvia |
| 1970s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Latvia |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Ecuador or Latvia?
- Ecuador, at 1 against 1 in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Ecuador and Latvia?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.