Denmark vs Western Sahara: Chief executive of the government is elected

Denmark
1
in 2025
Western Sahara
1
in 2025
Denmark rank
1st
Western Sahara rank
1st

Chief executive of the government is elected over time

  • Denmark
  • Western Sahara
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 1 against 1 in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Western Sahara Difference Ahead
1960s 1 0 1 Denmark
1970s 1 0 1 Denmark
1980s 1 0 1 Denmark
1990s 1 0 1 Denmark
2000s 1 0.2 0.8 Denmark
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Denmark or Western Sahara?
Denmark, at 1 against 1 in Western Sahara as of 2025.
What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Denmark and Western Sahara?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Western Sahara?
63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Western Sahara rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
Denmark ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Chief executive of the government is elected
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves β€” such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization β€” as not holding executive elections.