Czechia vs Uruguay: Chief executive of the government is elected
Czechia
1
in 2025
Uruguay
1
in 2025
Czechia rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Czechia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 1 against 1 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Uruguay ahead.
Czechia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0.9 | 1 | 0.1 | Uruguay |
| 1940s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Uruguay |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Czechia |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Czechia |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Czechia or Uruguay?
- Czechia, at 1 against 1 in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Czechia and Uruguay?
- 0, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Uruguay?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Uruguay rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Czechia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.