Comoros vs Suriname: Chief executive of the government is elected
Comoros
1
in 2025
Suriname
1
in 2025
Comoros rank
1st
Suriname rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Comoros
- Suriname
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 1 against 1 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 109 shared years of data; in 1886 it was Suriname ahead.
Comoros ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Suriname |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Suriname |
| 1970s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.6 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.8 | 1 | 0.2 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Comoros or Suriname?
- Comoros, at 1 against 1 in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Comoros and Suriname?
- 0, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Suriname?
- 109 years are reported by both, from 1886 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Suriname rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Comoros ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.