Comoros vs Malaysia: Chief executive of the government is elected

Comoros
1
in 2025
Malaysia
1
in 2025
Comoros rank
1st
Malaysia rank
1st

Chief executive of the government is elected over time

  • Comoros
  • Malaysia
00.20.40.60.81187419492025

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 1 against 1 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.

Across all 109 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Malaysia Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0.3 0.3 Malaysia
1960s 0 0.9 0.9 Malaysia
1970s 0.5 0.9 0.4 Malaysia
1980s 0.9 1 0.1 Malaysia
1990s 0.8 1 0.2 Malaysia
2000s 0.8 1 0.2 Malaysia
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Comoros or Malaysia?
Comoros, at 1 against 1 in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Comoros and Malaysia?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Malaysia?
109 years are reported by both, from 1886 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Malaysia rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
Comoros ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Chief executive of the government is elected
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves β€” such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization β€” as not holding executive elections.