Comoros vs Latvia: Chief executive of the government is elected

Comoros
1
in 2025
Latvia
1
in 2025
Comoros rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st

Chief executive of the government is elected over time

  • Comoros
  • Latvia
00.20.40.60.81188619552025

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 1 against 1 in Latvia, a difference of 0.

Across all 80 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Latvia Difference Ahead
1940s 0 1 1 Latvia
1950s 0 1 1 Latvia
1960s 0 1 1 Latvia
1970s 0.5 1 0.5 Latvia
1980s 0.9 1 0.1 Latvia
1990s 0.8 1 0.2 Latvia
2000s 0.8 1 0.2 Latvia
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Comoros or Latvia?
Comoros, at 1 against 1 in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Comoros and Latvia?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Latvia?
80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Latvia rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
Comoros ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Chief executive of the government is elected
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves β€” such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization β€” as not holding executive elections.