Cameroon vs Malaysia: Chief executive of the government is elected
Cameroon
1
in 2025
Malaysia
1
in 2025
Cameroon rank
1st
Malaysia rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Cameroon
- Malaysia
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 1 against 1 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 142 shared years of data; in 1884 it was Malaysia ahead.
Cameroon ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 15 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Malaysia |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Cameroon |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Cameroon |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Cameroon or Malaysia?
- Cameroon, at 1 against 1 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Cameroon and Malaysia?
- 0, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Malaysia?
- 142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
- How do Cameroon and Malaysia rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Cameroon ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.