Burundi vs Mauritius: Chief executive of the government is elected
Burundi
1
in 2025
Mauritius
1
in 2025
Burundi rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Burundi
- Mauritius
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 1 against 1 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
Across all 110 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Burundi or Mauritius?
- Burundi, at 1 against 1 in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Burundi and Mauritius?
- 0, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Mauritius?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Mauritius rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Burundi ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.