Botswana vs Laos: Chief executive of the government is elected
Botswana
1
in 2025
Laos
1
in 2025
Botswana rank
1st
Laos rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Botswana
- Laos
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1 against 1 in Laos, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 141 shared years of data; in 1885 it was Laos ahead.
Botswana ranks 1st and Laos ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 15 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Laos in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Laos |
| 1960s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Laos |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Botswana |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Botswana |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Botswana or Laos?
- Botswana, at 1 against 1 in Laos as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Botswana and Laos?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Laos?
- 141 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Laos rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Botswana ranks 1st and Laos ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.