Azerbaijan vs Chad: Chief executive of the government is elected
Azerbaijan
1
in 2025
Chad
1
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
1st
Chad rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Azerbaijan
- Chad
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 1 against 1 in Chad, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Chad ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 1st and Chad ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0.4 | 0 | 0.4 | Azerbaijan |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Azerbaijan |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Azerbaijan |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Azerbaijan |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Azerbaijan |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Azerbaijan or Chad?
- Azerbaijan, at 1 against 1 in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Azerbaijan and Chad?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Chad?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Azerbaijan and Chad rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Azerbaijan ranks 1st and Chad ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.