Albania vs Ecuador: Chief executive of the government is elected
Albania
1
in 2025
Ecuador
1
in 2025
Albania rank
1st
Ecuador rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Albania
- Ecuador
How they compare
Albania currently reports 1 against 1 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 114 shared years of data; in 1912 it was Ecuador ahead.
Albania ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 4 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Ecuador |
| 1920s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Albania |
| 1930s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Albania |
| 1940s | 0.9 | 1 | 0.1 | Ecuador |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | Albania |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Albania |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Albania or Ecuador?
- Albania, at 1 against 1 in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Albania and Ecuador?
- 0, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Ecuador?
- 114 years are reported by both, from 1912 to 2025.
- How do Albania and Ecuador rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Albania ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.