Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Malta: Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.9684 GPIA
in 2019
Malta
1.04 GPIA
in 2018
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
3rd
Malta rank
3rd

Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Malta
00.250.50.751198420012019

How they compare

Malta currently reports 1.04 GPIA against 0.9684 GPIA in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0716 GPIA.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 3rd of 36 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Malta Difference Ahead
1980s 0.8623 GPIA 0.9897 GPIA 0.1274 GPIA Malta
1990s 0.9123 GPIA 0.971 GPIA 0.0587 GPIA Malta
2000s 0.9422 GPIA 0.9742 GPIA 0.032 GPIA Malta
2010s 0.9647 GPIA 1.02 GPIA 0.0528 GPIA Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Malta?
Malta, at 1.04 GPIA against 0.9684 GPIA in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2018.
What is the difference in elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Malta?
0.0716 GPIA, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Malta?
5 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2018.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Malta rank globally for elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 3rd of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Malta: Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/elderly-literacy-rate-population-65-years-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/elderly-literacy-rate-population-65-years-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/malta/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Malta: Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
118 places, 2,112 data points, 1970–2019
Last refreshed

The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/