Libya vs Madagascar: Egalitarian Political Institutions Index
Libya
0.365
in 2025
Madagascar
0.34
in 2025
Libya rank
142nd
Madagascar rank
145th
Egalitarian Political Institutions Index over time
- Libya
- Madagascar
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.365 against 0.34 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.025.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
Across all 83 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 142nd and Madagascar ranks 145th of 175 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.158 | 0.137 | 0.021 | Libya |
| 1940s | 0.1515 | 0.139 | 0.0125 | Libya |
| 1950s | 0.4 | 0.1462 | 0.2538 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.3985 | 0.3642 | 0.0343 | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.468 | 0.3507 | 0.1173 | Libya |
| 1980s | 0.468 | 0.3552 | 0.1128 | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.468 | 0.3706 | 0.0974 | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.468 | 0.3776 | 0.0904 | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.5054 | 0.3546 | 0.1508 | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.39 | 0.3223 | 0.0677 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian political institutions index, Libya or Madagascar?
- Libya, at 0.365 against 0.34 in Madagascar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian political institutions index between Libya and Madagascar?
- 0.025, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Madagascar?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Madagascar rank globally for egalitarian political institutions index?
- Libya ranks 142nd and Madagascar ranks 145th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.