Comoros vs Nepal: Egalitarian Political Institutions Index
Comoros
0.576
in 2025
Nepal
0.58
in 2025
Comoros rank
91st
Nepal rank
89th
Egalitarian Political Institutions Index over time
- Comoros
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0.58 against 0.576 in Comoros, a difference of 0.004.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 91st and Nepal ranks 89th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 8 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.176 | 0.048 | 0.128 | Comoros |
| 1910s | 0.176 | 0.048 | 0.128 | Comoros |
| 1940s | 0.228 | 0.048 | 0.18 | Comoros |
| 1950s | 0.2338 | 0.1761 | 0.0577 | Comoros |
| 1960s | 0.2574 | 0.2231 | 0.0343 | Comoros |
| 1970s | 0.4176 | 0.2236 | 0.194 | Comoros |
| 1980s | 0.4484 | 0.2317 | 0.2167 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.5863 | 0.5967 | 0.0104 | Nepal |
| 2000s | 0.6104 | 0.6321 | 0.0217 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.5996 | 0.6412 | 0.0416 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0.5942 | 0.5905 | 0.0037 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian political institutions index, Comoros or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 0.58 against 0.576 in Comoros as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian political institutions index between Comoros and Nepal?
- 0.004, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Nepal?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Nepal rank globally for egalitarian political institutions index?
- Comoros ranks 91st and Nepal ranks 89th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.