Cameroon vs Guinea: Egalitarian Political Institutions Index

Cameroon
0.478
in 2025
Guinea
0.462
in 2025
Cameroon rank
117th
Guinea rank
120th

Egalitarian Political Institutions Index over time

  • Cameroon
  • Guinea
00.20.40.6190019622025

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0.478 against 0.462 in Guinea, a difference of 0.016.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea ahead.

Cameroon ranks 117th and Guinea ranks 120th of 175 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 4 and Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.336 0.451 0.115 Guinea
1970s 0.3333 0.458 0.1247 Guinea
1980s 0.3931 0.4157 0.0226 Guinea
1990s 0.4146 0.3929 0.0217 Cameroon
2000s 0.4656 0.4136 0.052 Cameroon
2010s 0.4759 0.4535 0.0224 Cameroon
2020s 0.4892 0.4495 0.0397 Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher egalitarian political institutions index, Cameroon or Guinea?
Cameroon, at 0.478 against 0.462 in Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in egalitarian political institutions index between Cameroon and Guinea?
0.016, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Guinea?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Cameroon and Guinea rank globally for egalitarian political institutions index?
Cameroon ranks 117th and Guinea ranks 120th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Egalitarian Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.