Brazil vs Niger: Egalitarian Political Institutions Index
Brazil
0.637
in 2025
Niger
0.637
in 2025
Brazil rank
80th
Niger rank
80th
Egalitarian Political Institutions Index over time
- Brazil
- Niger
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.637 against 0.637 in Niger, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Niger ahead.
Brazil ranks 80th and Niger ranks 80th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Niger in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.107 | 0.219 | 0.112 | Niger |
| 1930s | 0.2619 | 0.232 | 0.0299 | Brazil |
| 1940s | 0.2964 | 0.2547 | 0.0417 | Brazil |
| 1950s | 0.3055 | 0.2634 | 0.0421 | Brazil |
| 1960s | 0.3113 | 0.438 | 0.1267 | Niger |
| 1970s | 0.3141 | 0.4958 | 0.1817 | Niger |
| 1980s | 0.3984 | 0.5261 | 0.1277 | Niger |
| 1990s | 0.5915 | 0.6398 | 0.0483 | Niger |
| 2000s | 0.6449 | 0.6423 | 0.0026 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.6048 | 0.6395 | 0.0347 | Niger |
| 2020s | 0.569 | 0.6293 | 0.0603 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egalitarian political institutions index, Brazil or Niger?
- Brazil, at 0.637 against 0.637 in Niger as of 2025.
- What is the difference in egalitarian political institutions index between Brazil and Niger?
- 0, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Niger?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Niger rank globally for egalitarian political institutions index?
- Brazil ranks 80th and Niger ranks 80th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Egalitarian Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the protection of rights, access to power, and distribution of resources is equal.