Hong Kong vs Iceland: EDSTATS: Average Adjusted Test Score
EDSTATS: Average Adjusted Test Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Iceland
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 55.93 against 53.57 in Iceland, a difference of 2.36.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iceland ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 5th and Iceland ranks 8th of 29 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45.64 | 42.79 | 2.85 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 55.27 | 48.64 | 6.63 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 55.93 | 53.57 | 2.36 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edstats: average adjusted test score, Hong Kong or Iceland?
- Hong Kong, at 55.93 against 53.57 in Iceland as of 2010.
- What is the difference in edstats: average adjusted test score between Hong Kong and Iceland?
- 2.36, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Hong Kong and Iceland rank globally for edstats: average adjusted test score?
- Hong Kong ranks 5th and Iceland ranks 8th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Angrist, N., Patrinos, H. and Schlotter, M.. The World Bank (2013), published as EDSTATS: Average Adjusted Test Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A test score that has been standardized over time, across subjects, across schooling levels, and across various international and regional assessments. It is calculated by creating a ratio between U.S. scores averaged across subjects and over schooling level on all international tests (such as PISA and TIMSS) to average scores averaged across subjects and over schooling levels on the U.S. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) approximated to the nearest 5-year time step from 1965-2010. All raw international scores are averaged across subjects and over school levels and approximated to the nearest 5-year interval, averaged across tests, and then multiplied by this ratio. This makes these adjusted scores comparable over time, across countries and across international tests. Test scores from countries which only participate in regional assessments are included in the above transformation after being averaged across subjects and over schooling levels and then multiplied by a ratio comparing average scores across subjects and schooling levels in a given regional test and average scores across subjects and schooling levels on an international assessment for all doubloon countries - countries which participate in the same regional assessment and an international test. This makes adjusted test scores comparable over time, across subjects, across schooling levels, over countries and over all assessments.