Venezuela vs Zambia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Venezuela
0
in 2025
Zambia
0
in 2025
Venezuela rank
87th
Zambia rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Venezuela
- Zambia
How they compare
Venezuela currently reports 0 against 0 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Zambia ahead.
Venezuela ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Venezuela averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Venezuela | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Venezuela |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 2000s | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Venezuela or Zambia?
- Venezuela, at 0 against 0 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Venezuela and Zambia?
- 0, with Venezuela ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Venezuela and Zambia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Venezuela and Zambia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Venezuela ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.