United Arab Emirates vs Zimbabwe: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
United Arab Emirates
0
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0
in 2025
United Arab Emirates rank
87th
Zimbabwe rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- United Arab Emirates
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 0 against 0 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 55 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
United Arab Emirates ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, United Arab Emirates or Zimbabwe?
- United Arab Emirates, at 0 against 0 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.