Switzerland vs East Timor: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Switzerland
1
in 2025
East Timor
1
in 2025
Switzerland rank
1st
East Timor rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Switzerland
  • East Timor
00.20.40.60.81179819112025

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 1 against 1 in East Timor, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Switzerland ahead.

Switzerland ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Switzerland East Timor Difference Ahead
1900s 1 0 1 Switzerland
1910s 1 0 1 Switzerland
1920s 1 0 1 Switzerland
1930s 1 0 1 Switzerland
1940s 1 0 1 Switzerland
1950s 1 0 1 Switzerland
1960s 1 0 1 Switzerland
1970s 1 0 1 Switzerland
1980s 1 0 1 Switzerland
1990s 1 0 1 Switzerland
2000s 1 0.8 0.2 Switzerland
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Switzerland or East Timor?
Switzerland, at 1 against 1 in East Timor as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Switzerland and East Timor?
0, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and East Timor?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Switzerland and East Timor rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Switzerland ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.