Suriname vs Vanuatu: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Suriname
1
in 2025
Vanuatu
1
in 2025
Suriname rank
1st
Vanuatu rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Suriname
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 1 against 1 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Suriname ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 3 and Vanuatu in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Suriname |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Suriname |
| 1970s | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | Vanuatu |
| 1990s | 0.9 | 1 | 0.1 | Vanuatu |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Suriname or Vanuatu?
- Suriname, at 1 against 1 in Vanuatu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Suriname and Vanuatu?
- 0, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Vanuatu?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Suriname and Vanuatu rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Suriname ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.