Sri Lanka vs Taiwan: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Taiwan
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Taiwan rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Sri Lanka
- Taiwan
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1 against 1 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Taiwan ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 6 and Taiwan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Sri Lanka |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Taiwan |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Taiwan |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Sri Lanka or Taiwan?
- Sri Lanka, at 1 against 1 in Taiwan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Sri Lanka and Taiwan?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Taiwan?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Taiwan rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Sri Lanka ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.