Sri Lanka vs Suriname: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Suriname
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Suriname rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Suriname
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 1 against 1 in Suriname, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Suriname ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 4 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Suriname Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0.2 0 0.2 Sri Lanka
1950s 1 0.5 0.5 Sri Lanka
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 0.9 0.1 Sri Lanka
1980s 0.3 0.2 0.1 Sri Lanka
1990s 0.5 0.9 0.4 Suriname
2000s 0.3 1 0.7 Suriname
2010s 0.5 1 0.5 Suriname
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Sri Lanka or Suriname?
Sri Lanka, at 1 against 1 in Suriname as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Sri Lanka and Suriname?
0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Suriname?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Sri Lanka and Suriname rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Sri Lanka ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.