South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

South Sudan
0
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0
in 2025
South Sudan rank
87th
Zimbabwe rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • South Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.81182119232025

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0 against 0 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

South Sudan ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0 0 0 β€”
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
South Sudan, at 0 against 0 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
0, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
South Sudan ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.