South Africa vs Uruguay: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

South Africa
1
in 2025
Uruguay
1
in 2025
South Africa rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • South Africa
  • Uruguay
00.20.40.60.81182519252025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 1 against 1 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Uruguay Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0.7 0.7 Uruguay
1930s 0 0.4 0.4 Uruguay
1940s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1950s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1960s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1970s 0 0.2 0.2 Uruguay
1980s 0 0.5 0.5 Uruguay
1990s 0.5 1 0.5 Uruguay
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, South Africa or Uruguay?
South Africa, at 1 against 1 in Uruguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between South Africa and Uruguay?
0, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uruguay?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do South Africa and Uruguay rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
South Africa ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.