Slovenia vs East Timor: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Slovenia
1
in 2025
East Timor
1
in 2025
Slovenia rank
1st
East Timor rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Slovenia
- East Timor
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 1 against 1 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1900 it was East Timor ahead.
Slovenia ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Slovenia or East Timor?
- Slovenia, at 1 against 1 in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Slovenia and East Timor?
- 0, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and East Timor?
- 123 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Slovenia and East Timor rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Slovenia ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.