Singapore vs Zambia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Singapore
0
in 2025
Zambia
0
in 2025
Singapore rank
87th
Zambia rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Singapore
- Zambia
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0 against 0 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
Across all 115 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 87th of 176 regions.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Singapore or Zambia?
- Singapore, at 0 against 0 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Singapore and Zambia?
- 0, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Zambia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Singapore and Zambia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Singapore ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 87th of 176 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.