Sierra Leone vs Vietnam: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Sierra Leone
0
in 2025
Vietnam
0
in 2025
Sierra Leone rank
87th
Vietnam rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Vietnam
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 0 against 0 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Vietnam ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 87th and Vietnam ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Vietnam Difference Ahead
1970s 0 0 0
1980s 0 0 0
1990s 0 0 0
2000s 0.7 0 0.7 Sierra Leone
2010s 1 0 1 Sierra Leone
2020s 0.6667 0 0.6667 Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Sierra Leone or Vietnam?
Sierra Leone, at 0 against 0 in Vietnam as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Sierra Leone and Vietnam?
0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Vietnam?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do Sierra Leone and Vietnam rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Sierra Leone ranks 87th and Vietnam ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.