Russia vs Singapore: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Russia
0
in 2025
Singapore
0
in 2025
Russia rank
87th
Singapore rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Russia
  • Singapore
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Russia currently reports 0 against 0 in Singapore, a difference of 0.

Across all 158 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Russia ranks 87th and Singapore ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russia Singapore Difference Ahead
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0 0 0 β€”
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Russia or Singapore?
Russia, at 0 against 0 in Singapore as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Russia and Singapore?
0, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Singapore?
158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
How do Russia and Singapore rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Russia ranks 87th and Singapore ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.