Portugal vs East Timor: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Portugal
1
in 2025
East Timor
1
in 2025
Portugal rank
1st
East Timor rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Portugal
  • East Timor
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 1 against 1 in East Timor, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was East Timor ahead.

Portugal ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal East Timor Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0.4 0 0.4 Portugal
1980s 1 0 1 Portugal
1990s 1 0 1 Portugal
2000s 1 0.8 0.2 Portugal
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Portugal or East Timor?
Portugal, at 1 against 1 in East Timor as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Portugal and East Timor?
0, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and East Timor?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Portugal and East Timor rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Portugal ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.