Poland vs South Africa: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Poland
1
in 2025
South Africa
1
in 2025
Poland rank
1st
South Africa rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Poland
  • South Africa
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 1 against 1 in South Africa, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 103 shared years of data; in 1918 it was South Africa ahead.

Poland ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland South Africa Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0.6 0 0.6 Poland
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 1 0.5 0.5 Poland
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Poland or South Africa?
Poland, at 1 against 1 in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Poland and South Africa?
0, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and South Africa?
103 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Poland and South Africa rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Poland ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.