Pakistan vs Zambia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Pakistan
0
in 2025
Zambia
0
in 2025
Pakistan rank
87th
Zambia rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Pakistan
  • Zambia
00.20.40.60.81183919322025

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0 against 0 in Zambia, a difference of 0.

Across all 115 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Zambia Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0.2 0.2 Zambia
2010s 0 0.3 0.3 Zambia
2020s 0 0.5 0.5 Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Pakistan or Zambia?
Pakistan, at 0 against 0 in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Pakistan and Zambia?
0, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Zambia?
115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
How do Pakistan and Zambia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Pakistan ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.