North Macedonia vs Senegal: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

North Macedonia
1
in 2025
Senegal
1
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
1st
Senegal rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Senegal
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 1 against 1 in Senegal, a difference of 0.

Across all 119 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.

North Macedonia ranks 1st and Senegal ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Senegal Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0.2 1 0.8 Senegal
2000s 0.8 1 0.2 Senegal
2010s 0.4 1 0.6 Senegal
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, North Macedonia or Senegal?
North Macedonia, at 1 against 1 in Senegal as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between North Macedonia and Senegal?
0, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Senegal?
119 years are reported by both, from 1904 to 2025.
How do North Macedonia and Senegal rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
North Macedonia ranks 1st and Senegal ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.