North Macedonia vs Panama: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

North Macedonia
1
in 2025
Panama
1
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
1st
Panama rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Panama
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 1 against 1 in Panama, a difference of 0.

Across all 120 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

North Macedonia ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Panama Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0.2 0.9 0.7 Panama
2000s 0.8 1 0.2 Panama
2010s 0.4 1 0.6 Panama
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, North Macedonia or Panama?
North Macedonia, at 1 against 1 in Panama as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between North Macedonia and Panama?
0, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Panama?
120 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
How do North Macedonia and Panama rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
North Macedonia ranks 1st and Panama ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.