Nicaragua vs Yemen: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Nicaragua
0
in 2025
Yemen
0
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
87th
Yemen rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Yemen
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0 against 0 in Yemen, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 114 shared years of data; in 1839 it was Yemen ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 87th and Yemen ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Yemen Difference Ahead
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 1 0 1 Nicaragua
2000s 0.7 0 0.7 Nicaragua
2010s 0 0 0 β€”
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Nicaragua or Yemen?
Nicaragua, at 0 against 0 in Yemen as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Nicaragua and Yemen?
0, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Yemen?
114 years are reported by both, from 1839 to 2025.
How do Nicaragua and Yemen rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Nicaragua ranks 87th and Yemen ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.