New Zealand vs Vanuatu: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

New Zealand
1
in 2025
Vanuatu
1
in 2025
New Zealand rank
1st
Vanuatu rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • New Zealand
  • Vanuatu
00.20.40.60.81185319392025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1 against 1 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 176 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1900s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1910s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1920s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1930s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1940s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1950s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1960s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1970s 1 0 1 New Zealand
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, New Zealand or Vanuatu?
New Zealand, at 1 against 1 in Vanuatu as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between New Zealand and Vanuatu?
0, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Vanuatu?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do New Zealand and Vanuatu rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
New Zealand ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.