Montenegro vs East Timor: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Montenegro
1
in 2025
East Timor
1
in 2025
Montenegro rank
1st
East Timor rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Montenegro
  • East Timor
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 1 against 1 in East Timor, a difference of 0.

Across all 46 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Montenegro ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 176 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro East Timor Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1990s 0 0 0
2000s 0.6 0.8 0.2 East Timor
2010s 0.3 1 0.7 East Timor
2020s 0.8333 1 0.1667 East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Montenegro or East Timor?
Montenegro, at 1 against 1 in East Timor as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Montenegro and East Timor?
0, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and East Timor?
46 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Montenegro and East Timor rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Montenegro ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.