Montenegro vs Sri Lanka: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Montenegro
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Montenegro rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Montenegro
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Montenegro ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1990s 0 1 1 Sri Lanka
2000s 0.6 0.3 0.3 Montenegro
2010s 0.3 0.5 0.2 Sri Lanka
2020s 0.8333 1 0.1667 Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Montenegro or Sri Lanka?
Montenegro, at 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Montenegro and Sri Lanka?
0, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Sri Lanka?
46 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Montenegro and Sri Lanka rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Montenegro ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.