Montenegro vs Solomon Islands: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Montenegro
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Montenegro rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Montenegro
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Montenegro ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 0.8333 | 1 | 0.1667 | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Montenegro or Solomon Islands?
- Montenegro, at 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Montenegro and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Solomon Islands?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Montenegro and Solomon Islands rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Montenegro ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.