Mongolia vs South Africa: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Mongolia
1
in 2025
South Africa
1
in 2025
Mongolia rank
1st
South Africa rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Mongolia
  • South Africa
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 1 against 1 in South Africa, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was South Africa ahead.

Mongolia ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia South Africa Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0.9 0.5 0.4 Mongolia
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 0.8333 1 0.1667 South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Mongolia or South Africa?
Mongolia, at 1 against 1 in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Mongolia and South Africa?
0, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Africa?
115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
How do Mongolia and South Africa rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Mongolia ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.