Mali vs United Arab Emirates: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Mali
0
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
0
in 2025
Mali rank
87th
United Arab Emirates rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Mali
  • United Arab Emirates
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Mali currently reports 0 against 0 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Mali ranks 87th and United Arab Emirates ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 0 0 0
1980s 0 0 0
1990s 0.7 0 0.7 Mali
2000s 1 0 1 Mali
2010s 0.8 0 0.8 Mali
2020s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Mali or United Arab Emirates?
Mali, at 0 against 0 in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Mali and United Arab Emirates?
0, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and United Arab Emirates?
55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
How do Mali and United Arab Emirates rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Mali ranks 87th and United Arab Emirates ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.