Maldives vs Mongolia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Maldives
1
in 2025
Mongolia
1
in 2025
Maldives rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Maldives
- Mongolia
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 1 against 1 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Mongolia ahead.
Maldives ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.1 | 1 | 0.9 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.8333 | 0.1667 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Maldives or Mongolia?
- Maldives, at 1 against 1 in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Maldives and Mongolia?
- 0, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Mongolia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Maldives and Mongolia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Maldives ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.