Malaysia vs Switzerland: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Malaysia
1
in 2025
Switzerland
1
in 2025
Malaysia rank
1st
Switzerland rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Malaysia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1 against 1 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Switzerland ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Malaysia or Switzerland?
- Malaysia, at 1 against 1 in Switzerland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Malaysia and Switzerland?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Switzerland?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Switzerland rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Switzerland ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.