Luxembourg vs Switzerland: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Luxembourg
1
in 2025
Switzerland
1
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
1st
Switzerland rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Switzerland
00.20.40.60.81179819112025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 1 against 1 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.

Across all 111 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 1st and Switzerland ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Switzerland Difference Ahead
1910s 0.2 1 0.8 Switzerland
1920s 1 1 0 β€”
1930s 1 1 0 β€”
1940s 0.4 1 0.6 Switzerland
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Luxembourg or Switzerland?
Luxembourg, at 1 against 1 in Switzerland as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Luxembourg and Switzerland?
0, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Switzerland?
111 years are reported by both, from 1915 to 2025.
How do Luxembourg and Switzerland rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Switzerland ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.